![]() ![]() Pembrook, the Southern District of Illinois denied an Illinois University’s motion to dismiss a former student’s Free Speech claim. The plaintiff alleged that he would pray at the monument, and the relocation was hostile and offensive to those who used the monument to pray. Augustine, the Middle District of Florida found that when the City relocated a Confederate Civil War monument, it did not violate the Establishment Clause or plaintiff’s free exercise rights. The pastor married immigrant couples with children who were coming to the United States so that they would not be separated upon entry into the country. ![]() immigration officials violated a pastor’s free exercise rights by urging the Mexican government to deny him entry into Mexico. Department of Homeland Security, the Southern District of California held that U.S. He alleged that officers would interfere with his prayers, so he eventually stopped praying. The plaintiff was an inmate of Muslim faith who would pray during his shift breaks. Yost, the 3d Circuit held that qualified immunity can be asserted by prison officers in a suit brought against them under the RFRA, but the defendants had not shown facts that they were entitled to that defense. The preacher set up a banner, handed out religious literature, and preached through a megaphone without a permit on campus grounds. In that case, the 11th Circuit rejected an evangelical preacher’s challenge to an Alabama law which required a permit for any speaker who sought to participate in expressive conduct on university grounds. The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Keister v.Here are some important law-and-religion news stories from around the web: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |